About Bookmarks Contact Library Map Photos Search Talks
June
18
2005
10:39 am
Tags:
Post Meta :

Cover Art for The Spy Who Came In From the Cold I recently re-read Le Carre’s The Spy Who Came in From the Cold. I read this several years ago but I had thought it was a different novel. As I re-read it this time I kept thinking, this has a remarkably similar plot to a novel by . I spent many hours searching for information on how two novelists could write such similar novels. In the end it turned out that my memory was faulty and I had just read Le Carre’s book twice.

The Spy Who Came in From the Cold is the tale of a aging spymaster, set during the cold-war, whose luck has turned bad and seeks revenge against his nemisis. The protagonist is Alec Leamas, head of Britain’s Berlin desk. He runs a ring of spies who operate out of East Berlin. But Alec has a problem: as the story begins, the last of his spies is killed off. Alec’s nemisis is a Russian/East German named Mundt who has uncovered and killed each of Alec’s assets one-by-one. Alec’s bosses give him the opportunity to get revenge by becoming a double-agent. What unfolds is an interesting plot where the reader is never quite sure who is on who’s side.

The first time I read The Spy I believed I was reading a Deighton novel, and I remember at the time thinking about how rough it was compared to his others. It lacked the details that build a rich world in which the reader can get lost. After a second reading this is true, but of course I now see that it isn’t a rough Deighton novel, it is just a different author. The Spy is a novel that is essentially narration. The characters, even the protagonist and villians, are flat. For example, to convey that the protagonist is strong, Le Carre simply states that he is strong, that he has a strong neck and body. At times it reads more like a screenplay than a novel.

The saving grace is plot. It is intriguing and worthy of this book’s reputation.

The Spy is considered by many to be Le Carre’s best novel, while I have not read his other novels, I would guess that reputation is based on two strengths. First, the plot is a great example of the type of intrigue esponiage fans expect. As a reader you are never sure who is on what side, and you develop a healthy sense of paranoia which is both rewarded and invalidated at times. Second, the novel conveys that “cold-war espionage” feeling common to dramatic works from this genre set in post-world-war-II Europe. There is a certain feeling that the reader gets about the people and politics in Europe due to the tensions surrounding the division of Germany. Overall I liked the novel but it doesn’t rank as high as similar works by Len Deighton. I’d be compelled to see the movie version.

Note: Both the novel and movie are available from the Edmonton Public Library.

Comments
January
29
2007
8:57 am
Type:
Comment
dialM4mayhem

By chance, I saw the movie on TV Saturday night. It is fantastic. Shot in film noir style, Richard Burton plays Leamas and Nan, the naive librarian, is played by Claire Bloom. The drama is deep as Leamas, once off on the mission, learns one clue at a time how he and Nan have been used and deceived by MI5. The climax is during the secret spy trial of Mundt. The shock and disbelief of Leamus and Nan is acting at its finest as they encounter each other in the last place they ever expected to meet, a grim, makeshift secret courtroom in East Germany. The cold blooded nature of the spy game is brought fully home when Nan, now an obviously unacceptable security risk for Britain, is murdered as she and Seamus are climbing the Berlin wall in the night to freedom. On the other side of the wall, Smiley urges Seamus to jump over, to freedom, but Seamus is shocked to his core. Instead, he chooses death with Nan, who had been his set-up lover, and climbs back down the east side of the wall to instant death.

Participate! Leave your comment.